Därför kan inte Vampyrer existera.
I o med Halloween och det faktum att det börjar blossa upp lite mer twilight hysteri nu i o med att nästa film släpps tänkte jag dela med mig av en text jag snubblade över för någon månad sedan. Tyckte den var ytterst intressant att läsa. Den tar upp en massa aspekter över hur vampyrer helt enklet inte kan existera.
Citerat från HÄR:
ANYONE who tells you such things are "real" is either living in a fantasy, lying through their teeth, has mistaken autonomic biofeedback adrenaline/endorphin release for "draining", or are caught up in a delusion bordering on mental illness. Even worse they may be real predators such as pedophiles or murderers.
Drinking blood is a behavior of choice, not one of physiological necessity.
För den som inte orkar läsa hela eller som mot förmodan inte kan engelska så pass bra kan jag här sammanfatta lite lätt.
Fri översättning av punkterna a la Tili.
1. Vampyrer kan inte finnas. Personen som skriver berättar hur han upprepade gånger skrivit om detta o därför citerar sig själv.
2. Det är omöjligt för den männsikliga kroppen att enbart leva på blod.Här förklaras det en massa om hur den mänskliga upptagningsförmågan till celler fungerar och hur kroppen tar åt sig näring.
3. Här nämns det att det är viktigt att ha i åtanke att även blod som intas via munen måste brytas ner i magsäcken och föras ut till cellerna med sin näring. Blod som intas kan inte gå dirket ut i blodomloppet.
4. Om det hade gått o få blodet dirket ut i sitt blodomlopp hade man behövt göra detta minst en gång dagligen. Man ahde behövt svälja så mycket blod att det itne hade fått plats i magen. Det tar upp för stor volym för att vara möjligt. Sedan nämns det även något om att en person som får i sig så mycket järn som det är i blod ner i magen skulle kräkas.
5. Personer som säger att de är vampyrer leker i en fantasivärld.
6. Även om en vampyr bara åt 1 gång i veckan och dennes offer blev vampyr skulle det bli en alldeles för stor utbredning.
Ett hypotetiskt månads perspektiv skulle se ut så här.
1 vampyr gör 1 ny, alltså 2 st första veckan. Näste vecka 2 gör 2, 4 vampyrer totalt.
Tredje veckan, 4st gör 4 till, totalt 8 vampyrer. Fjärde veckan 8 gör 8 nya, 16 vampyrer totalt.
Så på en månad blir det 16 vampyrer. 256 efter 2 månader, 4096 efter 3 månader och efter 4 månader skulle det finnas 65,536. Efter 5 månader 1,048,476 st och på ett halvår skulle det hinna bli 33.572,832 vampyrer.
På ett ungefär säger vi att det är 33 miljoner vampyrer. Det skulle vara lika många som det idag finns Hiv/Aids smittade. Dessa skrivs det om, de syns m.m. Men aldrig har man ens hört om en vampyrattack. (Personen som skriver berättar även om sitt eget jobb på sjukhus o jämför med att han aldrig sett nått)
Efter ett år finns det ju dessutom ännu fler vampyrer.
7. Vampyr fladdermös. Har fått sitt namn pga att de driker blod. Det finns fler djur och insekter som gör detta. Inte blir det hysteri och historier om monster för den skull. De kan drika blod pga av deras storlek och magens volym i förhållande till den.
8. Folk som lever i tron om att det går att leva på blod och dricker blod lever farligt. Det är en stor risk för hälsan att dricka blod. Det finns många smittorisker m.m.
Det finns inga forskningar som tyder på att blod intaget som föda skulel ge några fördelar.
9. Det finns ingen vampyr gen. Man kan inte födas som vampyr. Om en sån gen hade funnits hade den i dagens samhälle redan upptäckts.
Sannolikheten att vampyrer skulle slinka undan och gömma sig från medecinsk och annan forskning är näst intill omöjligt.
10. Det finns inget vampyr virus. Jämför med HIV så ser du hur spridningen och informationen om det i så fall skulle se ut. Hade det funnits hade det upptäckts. Någon hade tillsist hamnat på sjukhus och blivit avslöjad. Ett virus kan inte ändra ditt DNA utan att du dör.
Källor:
Vampyrer kan alltså inte suga ur allt dit blod ur kroppen för det får inte plats i dem.
Blod ger ingen övernaturlig effekt.
Det finns inga bevis att stödja vampyrteorier på.
Folk som påstår sig vara vampyrer eller som tror de finns lever i fantasi illusioner.
Att dricka blod är ett val, inte ett måste.
Citerat från HÄR:
Vampires DO NOT exist, and this can be proven with the application of logic, critical thinking skills, and verified scientific and medical data:
1. Vampires, defined as a humanoid being that MUST consume blood or energy to survive do not exist. Cut and paste time, as it is too much work to type this out over and over and I "recycle" my own answers instead of retyping them so here goes. A brief discussion of the human digestive system and then the probable vampire population given an exponential growth rate should explain why vampires are not possible.
2. The human body is not designed to process large amounts of blood for nutrition. There is not enough protein, carbohydrates, and fats present in blood to maintain a complex creature such as Homo Sapiens or any theorized offshoot mutations. When a human ingests food it is first broken up into a bolus by chewing, then churned up in the stomach with digestive juices to form a mass called chyme. It then passes through the pylorus into the duodenum, part of the small intestine where it mixes with bile salts and secretions from the pancreas and liver which continue breaking it down on a molecular basis, mostly affecting fats at this point. The broken down nutrients pass through the wall of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they are carried to each cell or stored for later use. Indigestible bulk continues through the intestines, turning a dark brown from the bile. Water is absorbed from this mass in the large intestine depending on the needs of the body - a well-hydrated person will usually have a softer stool than a dehydrated person will. Water also enters the bloodstream, and this is what helps to maintain blood pressure. The pressure tends to balance itself in a healthy person because the bloodstream goes through a formation in the kidney called the Loop of Henle, where the narrowing blood vessel forces excess water and cellular waste such as urea out through the cellular wall into the kidneys, where it is excreted through the ureters into the bladder, and then out of the body via the urethral passageway.
3. IMPORTANT - A person physically unable to process his own food for nutrition therefore also could not process blood - it's the same process. Ingested blood does not transmit directly to the veins anyway - it would be chemically broken down by the digestive system.
4. Theoretical ingestion of blood to supply these nutrients would therefore have to occur at least once a day, and would require the ingestion of the entire blood supply which could not happen as the stomach is far too small to hold that much liquid volume. Hold up your clenched fist - under normal conditions your stomach is about that size. Furthermore, such a mass would be difficult to pass thru the intestines as it has no fibrous bulk, would create an intestinal impaction, causing massive vomiting from the large concentration of iron present, and any "real" vampire would have to eventually expel the waste, which would come out as a black, tarry, smelly goo, just as stool does when blood is present from a upper GI bleed.
5. These humans that affect the whole "vampiric lifestyle" are NOT vampires. They are simply humans playing their own little game, in their own little fantasy world, usually pandering to their own little sexual fetish, which may or may not actually be sexual.
6. Even if a vampire feeds once a week, and his victim also becomes a vampire, that is exponential growth, with four iterations a month. First iteration: One makes one, total two. Second iteration: Two make two, total four. Third iteration: Four make four, total eight. Fourth iteration: Eight make eight, total sixteen. 16 vampires at the end of one month, 256 at the end of the second month, 4096 by the end of the third month, 65,536 by the end of the fourth month, 1,048,476 at the end of the fifth, and 33,572,832 vampires at the end of half a year! By way of comparison, there are currently approximately 33 million people who have HIV/AIDS and the disease is a world-wide epidemic. I see people every day in the hospital with AIDS, but never has there been one documented case of a vampire attack. Do the math - vampires are a mathematical impossibility.
As for the idea that vampires existed "a long time ago" consider the estimated global population 5,000 years ago - using the above mathematical rationale, a single vampire could have converted every human on the globe in less than six months. This falls therefore, under the logic of Occam's Razor - which states that when you have removed every impossible answer, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Since there is no "vampiric plague" swarming the earth, the logical deduction is that they don't exist.
7. Point of clarification about "vampire" bats: vampire is simply the name we have given them because they do drink blood, same as a flea, mosquito, leech, or spider. Are these creatures vampires? No. They are living creatures, not legendary monsters. They can subsist on blood because of their smaller size and proportionately larger stomach volume. Drinking blood does not make you a vampire anymore than eating raw meat makes you a werewolf, although it might make you a mosquito.
8.The humans who profess to be vampires are victims of an all-encompassing self induced delusion. They are as human as you or I, regardless of their claims, and if they ingest HIV tainted blood they can most certainly contract the disease, esp. if they have any cuts, sores, or lesions in and or around their mouth. It is a very dangerous delusion to be laboring under. Note that there is absolutely no scientific or medical proof that these people derive any benefit at all from the ingestion of blood, and even worse are the so-called "psychic" vampires, because their delusion is one that they cannot substantiate with any concrete evidence at all.
9. There is no "vampire" gene. People are not "born" as vampires. When a woman goes to the hospital for prenatal care there are many tests done on mother and child, even while still in the womb, to check for many things, including genetic anomalies that result in deformities and birth defects. If such a gene existed, in today's world with today's technology it would have been found - we have already completely sequenced the human genome. It would also have to follow Mendel's law of dominant/recessive gene theory. Again, the odds on that many "vampires" all escaping the notice of the medical/scientific community are so low as to be almost nonexistent. The idea that there is a global "vampire community" engaging in controlled breeding to keep the "bloodline pure" is delusional in the extreme.
10. There is no "vampire virus" - as I have already pointed out, HIV is a virus, and look at how fast it has spread - virtually everyone knows someone with the affliction. According to the "vampire websites" there are "thousands" of vampires running around. If that was so then at least one of them has ended up in a hospital for bloodwork when they became pregnant, had a bloodborne infection, was injured in a car wreck, etc, etc, ad nauseum. The anomaly would have been detected and medical science would have isolated it, studied it, applied for research grants on it, published papers on it, and turned it into the talk of the medical and scientific community, as well as making its "discoverers" celebrities and rich beyond their dreams. A virus cannot alter your DNA in such a radical fashion without killing you.
1. Vampires, defined as a humanoid being that MUST consume blood or energy to survive do not exist. Cut and paste time, as it is too much work to type this out over and over and I "recycle" my own answers instead of retyping them so here goes. A brief discussion of the human digestive system and then the probable vampire population given an exponential growth rate should explain why vampires are not possible.
2. The human body is not designed to process large amounts of blood for nutrition. There is not enough protein, carbohydrates, and fats present in blood to maintain a complex creature such as Homo Sapiens or any theorized offshoot mutations. When a human ingests food it is first broken up into a bolus by chewing, then churned up in the stomach with digestive juices to form a mass called chyme. It then passes through the pylorus into the duodenum, part of the small intestine where it mixes with bile salts and secretions from the pancreas and liver which continue breaking it down on a molecular basis, mostly affecting fats at this point. The broken down nutrients pass through the wall of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they are carried to each cell or stored for later use. Indigestible bulk continues through the intestines, turning a dark brown from the bile. Water is absorbed from this mass in the large intestine depending on the needs of the body - a well-hydrated person will usually have a softer stool than a dehydrated person will. Water also enters the bloodstream, and this is what helps to maintain blood pressure. The pressure tends to balance itself in a healthy person because the bloodstream goes through a formation in the kidney called the Loop of Henle, where the narrowing blood vessel forces excess water and cellular waste such as urea out through the cellular wall into the kidneys, where it is excreted through the ureters into the bladder, and then out of the body via the urethral passageway.
3. IMPORTANT - A person physically unable to process his own food for nutrition therefore also could not process blood - it's the same process. Ingested blood does not transmit directly to the veins anyway - it would be chemically broken down by the digestive system.
4. Theoretical ingestion of blood to supply these nutrients would therefore have to occur at least once a day, and would require the ingestion of the entire blood supply which could not happen as the stomach is far too small to hold that much liquid volume. Hold up your clenched fist - under normal conditions your stomach is about that size. Furthermore, such a mass would be difficult to pass thru the intestines as it has no fibrous bulk, would create an intestinal impaction, causing massive vomiting from the large concentration of iron present, and any "real" vampire would have to eventually expel the waste, which would come out as a black, tarry, smelly goo, just as stool does when blood is present from a upper GI bleed.
5. These humans that affect the whole "vampiric lifestyle" are NOT vampires. They are simply humans playing their own little game, in their own little fantasy world, usually pandering to their own little sexual fetish, which may or may not actually be sexual.
6. Even if a vampire feeds once a week, and his victim also becomes a vampire, that is exponential growth, with four iterations a month. First iteration: One makes one, total two. Second iteration: Two make two, total four. Third iteration: Four make four, total eight. Fourth iteration: Eight make eight, total sixteen. 16 vampires at the end of one month, 256 at the end of the second month, 4096 by the end of the third month, 65,536 by the end of the fourth month, 1,048,476 at the end of the fifth, and 33,572,832 vampires at the end of half a year! By way of comparison, there are currently approximately 33 million people who have HIV/AIDS and the disease is a world-wide epidemic. I see people every day in the hospital with AIDS, but never has there been one documented case of a vampire attack. Do the math - vampires are a mathematical impossibility.
As for the idea that vampires existed "a long time ago" consider the estimated global population 5,000 years ago - using the above mathematical rationale, a single vampire could have converted every human on the globe in less than six months. This falls therefore, under the logic of Occam's Razor - which states that when you have removed every impossible answer, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Since there is no "vampiric plague" swarming the earth, the logical deduction is that they don't exist.
7. Point of clarification about "vampire" bats: vampire is simply the name we have given them because they do drink blood, same as a flea, mosquito, leech, or spider. Are these creatures vampires? No. They are living creatures, not legendary monsters. They can subsist on blood because of their smaller size and proportionately larger stomach volume. Drinking blood does not make you a vampire anymore than eating raw meat makes you a werewolf, although it might make you a mosquito.
8.The humans who profess to be vampires are victims of an all-encompassing self induced delusion. They are as human as you or I, regardless of their claims, and if they ingest HIV tainted blood they can most certainly contract the disease, esp. if they have any cuts, sores, or lesions in and or around their mouth. It is a very dangerous delusion to be laboring under. Note that there is absolutely no scientific or medical proof that these people derive any benefit at all from the ingestion of blood, and even worse are the so-called "psychic" vampires, because their delusion is one that they cannot substantiate with any concrete evidence at all.
9. There is no "vampire" gene. People are not "born" as vampires. When a woman goes to the hospital for prenatal care there are many tests done on mother and child, even while still in the womb, to check for many things, including genetic anomalies that result in deformities and birth defects. If such a gene existed, in today's world with today's technology it would have been found - we have already completely sequenced the human genome. It would also have to follow Mendel's law of dominant/recessive gene theory. Again, the odds on that many "vampires" all escaping the notice of the medical/scientific community are so low as to be almost nonexistent. The idea that there is a global "vampire community" engaging in controlled breeding to keep the "bloodline pure" is delusional in the extreme.
10. There is no "vampire virus" - as I have already pointed out, HIV is a virus, and look at how fast it has spread - virtually everyone knows someone with the affliction. According to the "vampire websites" there are "thousands" of vampires running around. If that was so then at least one of them has ended up in a hospital for bloodwork when they became pregnant, had a bloodborne infection, was injured in a car wreck, etc, etc, ad nauseum. The anomaly would have been detected and medical science would have isolated it, studied it, applied for research grants on it, published papers on it, and turned it into the talk of the medical and scientific community, as well as making its "discoverers" celebrities and rich beyond their dreams. A virus cannot alter your DNA in such a radical fashion without killing you.
Source(s):
No matter what people tell you, so-called "vampires" cannot drain you psychically, cannot gain supernatural nourishment from blood, and are not in any way shape or form "energy deficient". Humans do not give off prana, chi, the Force, or anything else that so-called "psy vamps" say they feed on. These are lies of the "vampire community" with absolutely no evidence to back them up, and are used in order to give their fantasies pseudo-legitimacy to people who are gullible enough to swallow this tripe hook, line, and sinker.ANYONE who tells you such things are "real" is either living in a fantasy, lying through their teeth, has mistaken autonomic biofeedback adrenaline/endorphin release for "draining", or are caught up in a delusion bordering on mental illness. Even worse they may be real predators such as pedophiles or murderers.
Drinking blood is a behavior of choice, not one of physiological necessity.
För den som inte orkar läsa hela eller som mot förmodan inte kan engelska så pass bra kan jag här sammanfatta lite lätt.
Fri översättning av punkterna a la Tili.
1. Vampyrer kan inte finnas. Personen som skriver berättar hur han upprepade gånger skrivit om detta o därför citerar sig själv.
2. Det är omöjligt för den männsikliga kroppen att enbart leva på blod.Här förklaras det en massa om hur den mänskliga upptagningsförmågan till celler fungerar och hur kroppen tar åt sig näring.
3. Här nämns det att det är viktigt att ha i åtanke att även blod som intas via munen måste brytas ner i magsäcken och föras ut till cellerna med sin näring. Blod som intas kan inte gå dirket ut i blodomloppet.
4. Om det hade gått o få blodet dirket ut i sitt blodomlopp hade man behövt göra detta minst en gång dagligen. Man ahde behövt svälja så mycket blod att det itne hade fått plats i magen. Det tar upp för stor volym för att vara möjligt. Sedan nämns det även något om att en person som får i sig så mycket järn som det är i blod ner i magen skulle kräkas.
5. Personer som säger att de är vampyrer leker i en fantasivärld.
6. Även om en vampyr bara åt 1 gång i veckan och dennes offer blev vampyr skulle det bli en alldeles för stor utbredning.
Ett hypotetiskt månads perspektiv skulle se ut så här.
1 vampyr gör 1 ny, alltså 2 st första veckan. Näste vecka 2 gör 2, 4 vampyrer totalt.
Tredje veckan, 4st gör 4 till, totalt 8 vampyrer. Fjärde veckan 8 gör 8 nya, 16 vampyrer totalt.
Så på en månad blir det 16 vampyrer. 256 efter 2 månader, 4096 efter 3 månader och efter 4 månader skulle det finnas 65,536. Efter 5 månader 1,048,476 st och på ett halvår skulle det hinna bli 33.572,832 vampyrer.
På ett ungefär säger vi att det är 33 miljoner vampyrer. Det skulle vara lika många som det idag finns Hiv/Aids smittade. Dessa skrivs det om, de syns m.m. Men aldrig har man ens hört om en vampyrattack. (Personen som skriver berättar även om sitt eget jobb på sjukhus o jämför med att han aldrig sett nått)
Efter ett år finns det ju dessutom ännu fler vampyrer.
7. Vampyr fladdermös. Har fått sitt namn pga att de driker blod. Det finns fler djur och insekter som gör detta. Inte blir det hysteri och historier om monster för den skull. De kan drika blod pga av deras storlek och magens volym i förhållande till den.
8. Folk som lever i tron om att det går att leva på blod och dricker blod lever farligt. Det är en stor risk för hälsan att dricka blod. Det finns många smittorisker m.m.
Det finns inga forskningar som tyder på att blod intaget som föda skulel ge några fördelar.
9. Det finns ingen vampyr gen. Man kan inte födas som vampyr. Om en sån gen hade funnits hade den i dagens samhälle redan upptäckts.
Sannolikheten att vampyrer skulle slinka undan och gömma sig från medecinsk och annan forskning är näst intill omöjligt.
10. Det finns inget vampyr virus. Jämför med HIV så ser du hur spridningen och informationen om det i så fall skulle se ut. Hade det funnits hade det upptäckts. Någon hade tillsist hamnat på sjukhus och blivit avslöjad. Ett virus kan inte ändra ditt DNA utan att du dör.
Källor:
Vampyrer kan alltså inte suga ur allt dit blod ur kroppen för det får inte plats i dem.
Blod ger ingen övernaturlig effekt.
Det finns inga bevis att stödja vampyrteorier på.
Folk som påstår sig vara vampyrer eller som tror de finns lever i fantasi illusioner.
Att dricka blod är ett val, inte ett måste.
Kommentarer
Postat av: Helena
I slutet av november.
Vampyrer har inte mänskliga kläder som; munkjackor, jeans och nattpajta.
Vampyrer har svarta eller röda mantlar, de svarta är onda och de röda är goda. De med svarta mantlarna ser ut som, jag vet att jag låter "löjlig", iallafall, Voldermort "i Harry Potter". Men dessa vampyrer har röda ögon, så om ni ser dem - hota dom inte med dina tankar, för då dödar dem er med ett vapen som liknar ett "Lie". De med röda mantlar har iallafall hår på skallen, deras röda mantlar är gjord av siden och de har guldbruna ögon, och sedan har de en svart krage runt halsen. Iallafall, jag drömmer om vampyrer nästan varjedag. Det finns en kille med röd mantel som vill skydda mig, sedan har han gett mig ett halsband "i drömmen då" och sen sa han; denna tillhör min moster Matilda" och den var mycket vacker. Och btw; en del vampyrer med röda mantlar är inte kapabla att älska "tyvvär". /Helena
P.S "jag är inte ett vampyrfreak" Och jag gillar inte Twilight så mycket alls. Men nu vet ni/du!
Trackback
